Under Australian patent law, there is no statutory position on whether a business method is
patentable subject matter, and so it is legal precedent that provides guidance.

The watershed NRDC (1) case opened the door to what can be considered patentable subject matter in Australian law, to beyond merely ‘vendible products’ (2) , and now includes things such as living organisms, genetic materials, computer software and methods of treating humans.

Those principles were applied in the 2006 case of Grant v Commissioner of Patents (3) which involved a method for restructuring financial trusts to the benefit of members. In denying the patent, the Full Court said that the patent must results in some kind of physical phenomenon or transformation in order to be patentable. In this instance, as there was no physical effect or application, the patent was not allowed. The case is relevant in that it qualifies the broad NRDC by requiring some physical effect to be brought about by the patent.

The policy of IP Australia is to treat business methods like any other subject matter, in that they are
not specifically excluded so long as they meet all the other requirements of patent law. (4) Thus, the
current position of business methods as patentable subject matter in Australia is that a business
methods may be patentable long as it has some physical phenomenon or manifestation. IP
Australia makes the following statement:

“A patent may be granted for a business method where the method directly involves a physical form
or device to bring about a useful product. The application of technology for conducting a business
method must be directly involved in a substantial way, not an incidental way.” See here for more.

In regards to the legislature making a statement on this rather than the judiciary, a 2003 review (5) by Australia’s Advisory Council on Intellectual Property of the appropriateness of patenting business
methods which found it may not be desirable said the issue was not significant enough to warrant a
change to Australian patent law. So a legislative statement any time soon look unlikely.

In any case, patents are both very difficult and very expensive to obtain. You may have other
intellectual property rights in your business that you can identify. A trademark is a different (not
alternative) form of intellectual property protection for your business. A trademark will protect your
name or brand which in many cases is more important than any business method underlying the
function of the business.



1 National Research Development Corp v Commissioner of Patents (1959) 102 CLR 252; 1A IPR 63 at CLR 275;
IPR 74 (High Court of Australia)
2 As ruled under Morton’s Rules.
3 Grant v Commissioner of Patents [2006] FCAFC 120
4 See para of the IP Australia Patent Examiner’s Manual
5 Australia’s Advisory Council on Intellectual Property, Report on a Review of the Patenting of Business Systems,
September 2003

Need some advice on this?

If you need some more advice in your particualr case, we offer a free initial consultation.

What Happens If I Don’t Get a Trademark?

Do I Need a Registered Trademark? Having an officially registered trademark for your business is not actually a legal requirement.  As long as you are otherwise obeying the legal obligations of running your business, such as having the correct licences, paying taxes...

Differences between IRDA and national trade marks

Are there any substantive differences in trade marks practice and law between trade marks protected in Australia as international marks and national marks?   INTRODUCTION International trade marks and brands that exist and trade in nations across the globe are...

5 Steps to Get a Trademark in Australia

A registered trademark in Australia will provide you with protection for your brand, name or logo. To help you on your way to protecting your business, this article describes how to get a trademark in Australia. A properly registered trade mark will help distinguish...

Protect your trade mark in the United States

There is no single worldwide trade mark registration.  You will need to apply to each country in which you would like to have a registered trade mark.  Even for large companies, this task can prove too cumbersome and expensive.  Therefore, the pragmatic route is to...

Problems with Amazon Recognising IP Australia Trademarks

To protect its seller's trademarks, Amazon has recently rolled out its Amazon Brand Registry to Australian sellers.  To learn more about what the Amazon Brand Registry is for trademarks and why you should use it to protect your brand, you can read our recent article...

When Do I Need to Trademark?

As a new business manager, you might ask yourself whether it is necessary to register your trademark immediately or if it is something that can wait until you are more established in the marketplace. You might wonder why, if you have already taken the steps to...

Trade mark an invention or product

A trade mark can be a strong mechanism of protection for an invention or a product. This can be especially useful in cases where patent protection is not possible or otherwise difficult. A product can be branded with a name or logo. Even the shape of a product can be...

Why Was My Trademark Rejected?

What Causes A Trademark To Be Rejected? A registered trademark will give you a legal monopoly over the word or logo that you have registered.  This is a powerful right, and the government will not grant it without first examining it on several grounds.   Let’s first...

Difference Between Trademarks, Copyright and Patents

There is often confusion about the differences between trademarks, patents and copyright.  This is no surprise as the law in this area is quite complex and very conceptual.  This post provides a brief overview of the differences. But firstly, let’s start with the...

What is the Amazon Brand Registry and Why I Need a Trademark?

Amazon has recently updated its brand registry.  The main change for sellers is that their brand must be a live registered trademark.  That is, in order to be eligible for the Amazon Brand Registry, the brand can no longer be just a name or logo, it needs to be one...